| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
10/01/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
10/01/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
GUARIN, J. R.; MARTRE, P; EWERT, F.; WEBBER, H.; DUERI, S.; CALDERINI, D.; REYNOLDS, M.; MOLERO, G.; MIRALLES, D.; GARCIA, G.; SLAFER, G.; GIUNTA, F.; PEQUENO, D. N. L.; STELLA, T.; AHMED, M.; ALDERMAN, P. D.; BASSO, B.; BERGER, A.; BINDI, M.; BRACHO-MUJICA, G.; CAMMARANO, D.; CHEN, Y.; DUMONT, B.; REZAEI, E. E.; FERERES, E.; FERRISE, R.; GAISER, T.; GAO, Y.; GARCIA-VILA, M.; GAYLER, S.; HOCHMAN, Z.; HOOGENBOOM, G.; HUNT, L. A.; KERSEBAUM, K. C.; NENDEL, C.; OLESEN, J. E.; PALOSUO, T.; PRIESACK, E.; PULLENS, J. W. M.; RODRÍGUEZ, A.; RÖTTER, R. P.; RUIZ RAMOS, M.; SEMENOV, M. A.; SENAPATI, N.; SIEBERT, S.; SRIVASTAVA, A. M.; STÖCKLE, C.; SUPIT, I.; TAO, F.; THORBURN, P.; WANG, E.; WEBER, T. K. D.; XIAO, L.; ZHANG, Z.; ZHAO, C.; ZHAO, J.; ZHAO, Z.; ZHU, Y.; ASSENG, S. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOSE RAFAEL GUARIN, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Dpt., Univ. of Florida, FL, USA; Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia Univ., NY, USA; NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NY, USA.; PIERRE MARTRE, LEPSE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France; FRANK EWERT, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; HEIDI WEBBER, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; SIBYLLE DUERI, LEPSE, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France; DANIEL CALDERINI, Institute of Plant Production and Protection, Austral University of Chile, Valdivia, Chile; MATTHEW REYNOLDS, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico DF, Mexico; GEMMA MOLERO, KWS, Lille, France; DANIEL MIRALLES, Department of Plant Production, University of Buenos Aires, IFEVA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GUILLERMO GARCIA, Department of Plant Production, University of Buenos Aires, IFEVA-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; GUSTAVO SLAFER, Department of Crop and Forest Sciences, University of Lleida—AGROTECNIO-CERCA Center, Lleida, Spain; and ICREA, Catalonian Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain; FRANCESCO GIUNTA, Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Ital; DIEGO N L PEQUENO, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico DF, Mexico; TOMMASO STELLA, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; MUKHTAR AHMED, Department of Agronomy, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan; Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden; PHILLIP D ALDERMAN, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States of America; BRUNO BASSO, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America; W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States of America; ANDRES GUSTAVO BERGER RICCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARCO BINDI, Department of AGRIculture, food, environment and forestry (DAGRI), Department of Agri-food Production and Environmental Sciences (DISPAA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; GENNADY BRACHO-MUJICA, Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; DAVIDE CAMMARANO, Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America; YI CHEN, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; BENJAMIN DUMONT, Department Terra & AgroBioChem, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Gembloux, Belgium; EHSAN EYSHI REZAEI, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; ELIAS FERERES, IAS-CSIC DAUCO, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain; ROBERTO FERRISE, Department of AGRIculture, food, environment and forestry (DAGRI), Department of Agri-food Production and Environmental Sciences (DISPAA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy; THOMAS GAISER, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; YUJING GAO, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; MARGARITA GARCIA-VILA, IAS-CSIC DAUCO, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain; SEBASTIAN GAYLER, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; ZVI HOCHMAN, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; GERRIT HOOGENBOOM, Agricultural & Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; LESLIE A HUNT, Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; KURT C KERSEBAUM, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), Univ. of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Global Change Research Institute Academy of Sciences of the Czech Rep; CLAAS NENDEL, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany; Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), Univ. of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Global Change Research Institute Academy of Sciences of the Czech Repu; JØRGEN E OLESEN, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; TARU PALOSUO, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland; ECKART PRIESACK, Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; JOHANNES W M PULLENS, Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; ALFREDO RODRÍGUEZ, CEIGRAM, Technic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Economic Analysis and Finances, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain; REIMUND P RÖTTER, Tropical Plant Production and Agricultural Systems Modelling (TROPAGS), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; Centre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use (CBL), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; MARGARITA RUIZ RAMOS, CEIGRAM, Technic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; MIKHAIL A SEMENOV, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom; NIMAI SENAPATI, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom; STEFAN SIEBERT, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany; AMIT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation INRES, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; CLAUDIO STÖCKLE, Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States of America; IWAN SUPIT, Water & Food and Water Systems & Global Change Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands; FULU TAO, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland; PETER THORBURN, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; ENLI WANG, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; TOBIAS KARL DAVID WEBER, Institute of Soil Science and Land Evaluation, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany; Current affiliation: Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Organic Soil Sciences, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany; LIUJUN XIAO, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiang; ZHAO ZHANG, State Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; CHUANG ZHAO, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; JIN ZHAO, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; ZHIGAN ZHAO, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; Department of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; YAN ZHU, National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for M; SENTHOLD ASSENG, 8 Department of Life Science Engineering, Digital Agriculture, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. |
|
Título : |
Evidence for increasing global wheat yield potential. [Letter]. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Environmental Research Letters, 12 December 2022, Volume 17, 124045. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c |
|
ISSN : |
1748-9326 |
|
DOI : |
10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 13 June 2022; Accepted 30 November 2022; Published 12 December 2022. -- Corresponding author: Jose Rafael Guarin, E-mail: j.guarin@columbia.edu -- LICENSE: Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) -- Supplementary material for this article is available online (http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c ) -- |
|
Contenido : |
Wheat is the most widely grown food crop, with 761 Mt produced globally in 2020. To meet the expected grain demand by mid-century, wheat breeding strategies must continue to improve upon yield-advancing physiological traits, regardless of climate change impacts. Here, the best performing doubled haploid (DH) crosses with an increased canopy photosynthesis from wheat field experiments in the literature were extrapolated to the global scale with a multi-model ensemble of process-based wheat crop models to estimate global wheat production. The DH field experiments were also used to determine a quantitative relationship between wheat production and solar radiation to estimate genetic yield potential. The multi-model ensemble projected a global annual wheat production of 1050 ± 145 Mt due to the improved canopy photosynthesis, a 37% increase, without expanding cropping area. Achieving this genetic yield potential would meet the lower estimate of the projected grain demand in 2050, albeit with considerable challenges.
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd |
|
Palabras claves : |
Crop model ensemble; Global food security; Radiation use efficiency; Wheat potential yield; Yield increase. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03876naa a2200913 a 4500
001 1063941
005 2023-01-10
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1748-9326
024 7 $a10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c$2DOI
100 1 $aGUARIN, J. R.
245 $aEvidence for increasing global wheat yield potential. [Letter].$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 13 June 2022; Accepted 30 November 2022; Published 12 December 2022. -- Corresponding author: Jose Rafael Guarin, E-mail: j.guarin@columbia.edu -- LICENSE: Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) -- Supplementary material for this article is available online (http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c ) --
520 $aWheat is the most widely grown food crop, with 761 Mt produced globally in 2020. To meet the expected grain demand by mid-century, wheat breeding strategies must continue to improve upon yield-advancing physiological traits, regardless of climate change impacts. Here, the best performing doubled haploid (DH) crosses with an increased canopy photosynthesis from wheat field experiments in the literature were extrapolated to the global scale with a multi-model ensemble of process-based wheat crop models to estimate global wheat production. The DH field experiments were also used to determine a quantitative relationship between wheat production and solar radiation to estimate genetic yield potential. The multi-model ensemble projected a global annual wheat production of 1050 ± 145 Mt due to the improved canopy photosynthesis, a 37% increase, without expanding cropping area. Achieving this genetic yield potential would meet the lower estimate of the projected grain demand in 2050, albeit with considerable challenges. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd
653 $aCrop model ensemble
653 $aGlobal food security
653 $aRadiation use efficiency
653 $aWheat potential yield
653 $aYield increase
700 1 $aMARTRE, P
700 1 $aEWERT, F.
700 1 $aWEBBER, H.
700 1 $aDUERI, S.
700 1 $aCALDERINI, D.
700 1 $aREYNOLDS, M.
700 1 $aMOLERO, G.
700 1 $aMIRALLES, D.
700 1 $aGARCIA, G.
700 1 $aSLAFER, G.
700 1 $aGIUNTA, F.
700 1 $aPEQUENO, D. N. L.
700 1 $aSTELLA, T.
700 1 $aAHMED, M.
700 1 $aALDERMAN, P. D.
700 1 $aBASSO, B.
700 1 $aBERGER, A.
700 1 $aBINDI, M.
700 1 $aBRACHO-MUJICA, G.
700 1 $aCAMMARANO, D.
700 1 $aCHEN, Y.
700 1 $aDUMONT, B.
700 1 $aREZAEI, E. E.
700 1 $aFERERES, E.
700 1 $aFERRISE, R.
700 1 $aGAISER, T.
700 1 $aGAO, Y.
700 1 $aGARCIA-VILA, M.
700 1 $aGAYLER, S.
700 1 $aHOCHMAN, Z.
700 1 $aHOOGENBOOM, G.
700 1 $aHUNT, L. A.
700 1 $aKERSEBAUM, K. C.
700 1 $aNENDEL, C.
700 1 $aOLESEN, J. E.
700 1 $aPALOSUO, T.
700 1 $aPRIESACK, E.
700 1 $aPULLENS, J. W. M.
700 1 $aRODRÍGUEZ, A.
700 1 $aRÖTTER, R. P.
700 1 $aRUIZ RAMOS, M.
700 1 $aSEMENOV, M. A.
700 1 $aSENAPATI, N.
700 1 $aSIEBERT, S.
700 1 $aSRIVASTAVA, A. M.
700 1 $aSTÖCKLE, C.
700 1 $aSUPIT, I.
700 1 $aTAO, F.
700 1 $aTHORBURN, P.
700 1 $aWANG, E.
700 1 $aWEBER, T. K. D.
700 1 $aXIAO, L.
700 1 $aZHANG, Z.
700 1 $aZHAO, C.
700 1 $aZHAO, J.
700 1 $aZHAO, Z.
700 1 $aZHU, Y.
700 1 $aASSENG, S.
773 $tEnvironmental Research Letters, 12 December 2022, Volume 17, 124045. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca77c
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
13/08/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
16/08/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CONIBERTI, A.; FERRARI, V.; DISEGNA, E.; GARCÍA PETILLO, M.; LAKSO, A.N. |
|
Afiliación : |
ANDRES CONIBERTI MUNDY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VIRGINIA PAULINA FERRARI MORENA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; EDGARDO JOSE DISEGNA LIGUORI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIO GARCÍA PETILLO, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; A.N. LAKSO, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University. |
|
Título : |
Complete vineyard floor cover crop to reduce grapevine susceptibility to bunch rot. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
European Journal of Agronomy, September 2018, v.99: 167-176. |
|
ISSN : |
1161-0301 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.eja.2018.07.006 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 14 September 2017; Received in revised form 1 July 2018; Accepted 13 July 2018.
This research was supported by ANII (Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación), INAVI (Instituto Nacional de Vitivinicultura) , FUCREA (Federación Uruguaya de grupos CREA) and INIA Uruguay (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria). |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Excessive vine growth not only negatively impacts fruit composition but also fosters bunch rot incidence. The goal of our study was to improve Vitis vinifera (Tannat) grape and wine composition and decrease bunch rot incidence by achieving adequate vine vegetative growth in a humid climate. Our approach was to use under-trellis cover crops (UTCC) to limit vine water availability and reduce excessive vine growth. We tested UTCC consisting of full cover of the vineyard soil with red fescue (Festuca rubra) versus conventional alleyway red fescue with 1.0 m wide weed-free strips under the trellis (H). As excessive competition with grapevines remains the main reason for UTCC rejection, this strategy was tested in combination with two irrigation schedules?irrigation to avoid water restriction at bloom (Ir) vs. no early irrigation?and two nitrogen inputs (0 vs. 100 kg N ha−1) over three growing seasons in southern Uruguay. Treatments were arranged in a split-split-plot randomized block design with cover crop schemes as main plots, water availability as subplots and nitrogen inputs as sub-subplots. Shoot growth rate, mid-day stem water potential (Ψstem), berry size and berry composition were monitored over the season, as well as final yield, cluster and pruning weights. UTCC significantly reduced vine vegetative growth, while no significant differences were detected between H and UTCC when irrigation took place early in the season. Even nitrogen input showed positive effects on grapevine vegetative growth in some cases, water availability at bloom was the key driver of vegetative growth. UTCC treatments increased grape soluble solids (TSS) in the last two out of three seasons and consistently increased anthocyanin concentration in grapes. Independent of vegetative growth, strong differences in bunch rot incidence were detected between H and UTCC treatments. Seasonal variations in water status and/or free amino nitrogen content of grapes may have a relevant impact on disease susceptibility at harvest.
© 2018 Elsevier B.V. MenosABSTRACT.
Excessive vine growth not only negatively impacts fruit composition but also fosters bunch rot incidence. The goal of our study was to improve Vitis vinifera (Tannat) grape and wine composition and decrease bunch rot incidence by achieving adequate vine vegetative growth in a humid climate. Our approach was to use under-trellis cover crops (UTCC) to limit vine water availability and reduce excessive vine growth. We tested UTCC consisting of full cover of the vineyard soil with red fescue (Festuca rubra) versus conventional alleyway red fescue with 1.0 m wide weed-free strips under the trellis (H). As excessive competition with grapevines remains the main reason for UTCC rejection, this strategy was tested in combination with two irrigation schedules?irrigation to avoid water restriction at bloom (Ir) vs. no early irrigation?and two nitrogen inputs (0 vs. 100 kg N ha−1) over three growing seasons in southern Uruguay. Treatments were arranged in a split-split-plot randomized block design with cover crop schemes as main plots, water availability as subplots and nitrogen inputs as sub-subplots. Shoot growth rate, mid-day stem water potential (Ψstem), berry size and berry composition were monitored over the season, as well as final yield, cluster and pruning weights. UTCC significantly reduced vine vegetative growth, while no significant differences were detected between H and UTCC when irrigation took place early in the season. Even nitrogen input showed pos... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BUNCH ROT; GRAPE COMPOSITION; NITROGEN; UNDER-TRELLIS COVER CROP; VEGETATIVE GROWTH; WATER POTENTIAL. |
|
Thesagro : |
VITIS; VITIS VINIFERA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03272naa a2200301 a 4500
001 1058897
005 2018-08-16
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1161-0301
024 7 $a10.1016/j.eja.2018.07.006$2DOI
100 1 $aCONIBERTI, A.
245 $aComplete vineyard floor cover crop to reduce grapevine susceptibility to bunch rot.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Received 14 September 2017; Received in revised form 1 July 2018; Accepted 13 July 2018. This research was supported by ANII (Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación), INAVI (Instituto Nacional de Vitivinicultura) , FUCREA (Federación Uruguaya de grupos CREA) and INIA Uruguay (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria).
520 $aABSTRACT. Excessive vine growth not only negatively impacts fruit composition but also fosters bunch rot incidence. The goal of our study was to improve Vitis vinifera (Tannat) grape and wine composition and decrease bunch rot incidence by achieving adequate vine vegetative growth in a humid climate. Our approach was to use under-trellis cover crops (UTCC) to limit vine water availability and reduce excessive vine growth. We tested UTCC consisting of full cover of the vineyard soil with red fescue (Festuca rubra) versus conventional alleyway red fescue with 1.0 m wide weed-free strips under the trellis (H). As excessive competition with grapevines remains the main reason for UTCC rejection, this strategy was tested in combination with two irrigation schedules?irrigation to avoid water restriction at bloom (Ir) vs. no early irrigation?and two nitrogen inputs (0 vs. 100 kg N ha−1) over three growing seasons in southern Uruguay. Treatments were arranged in a split-split-plot randomized block design with cover crop schemes as main plots, water availability as subplots and nitrogen inputs as sub-subplots. Shoot growth rate, mid-day stem water potential (Ψstem), berry size and berry composition were monitored over the season, as well as final yield, cluster and pruning weights. UTCC significantly reduced vine vegetative growth, while no significant differences were detected between H and UTCC when irrigation took place early in the season. Even nitrogen input showed positive effects on grapevine vegetative growth in some cases, water availability at bloom was the key driver of vegetative growth. UTCC treatments increased grape soluble solids (TSS) in the last two out of three seasons and consistently increased anthocyanin concentration in grapes. Independent of vegetative growth, strong differences in bunch rot incidence were detected between H and UTCC treatments. Seasonal variations in water status and/or free amino nitrogen content of grapes may have a relevant impact on disease susceptibility at harvest. © 2018 Elsevier B.V.
650 $aVITIS
650 $aVITIS VINIFERA
653 $aBUNCH ROT
653 $aGRAPE COMPOSITION
653 $aNITROGEN
653 $aUNDER-TRELLIS COVER CROP
653 $aVEGETATIVE GROWTH
653 $aWATER POTENTIAL
700 1 $aFERRARI, V.
700 1 $aDISEGNA, E.
700 1 $aGARCÍA PETILLO, M.
700 1 $aLAKSO, A.N.
773 $tEuropean Journal of Agronomy, September 2018$gv.99: 167-176.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
